hi guys!!
It's ME again
This thread has been great to help clarify misconceptions and add details where there may have been blurry spots! Thank you all for giving us the opportunity to shed some natural light on things <3
My hubby (also known as Serge, Fig or Mr. Fox) has been following this thread like a HAWK! haha. And he lovingly wrote the following words and kind-of hinted that I share it with you. He has some good points to offer, so I agreed
All of that being said...I give you Serge!
*****************************************************
Hello all!
I believe we all know and experienced how a text or an email can be misread, misunderstood and misconstrued (to heartbreaking results at times!). It's one of the trappings and pitfalls that happens when the writing lacks the speaker's tone, facial expressions and cues that a real-life conversation conveys naturally. Moreover, a conversation allows to ask immediate questions like "what do you mean by that?" to help clarify any questions, and avoid mis-perception.
Ink.Academy (and Suzie) is coming with something different than what we've all been used to so far in the calligraphy world. As hard as Suzie is trying to convey every detail on the subject, inevitably some will read it as if it were a text message and it can become loaded with very primal emotional responses, with no chance for a real conversation to relieve doubts or fear (or it seems, even anger at times).
I find myself puzzled at to why so few people are taking the time to enquire with questions directly to the source (aka asking Suzie) instead of venting fully formed opinion randomly. It could potentially defuse so many misconceptions (but not all - as I am quite aware that some times opinions will naturally differ, and that's all right too). What is distressing is seeing opinions being vocalized based on incomplete or unclear bits of information.
Subjects like cost of the program(s); where does the money go; teacher credentials; classes offered - to name just a few topics - so far brought some elevated emotions and conversations. many of which could potentially have been cleared up with simple questions to Suzie (or so I believe).
In a lightning-speed-nutshell here are a few thing one could have heard:
The $2800 cost everyone talks about is for the Master's Certification program: we're talking two years worth of classes (with a minimum of four different subjects). The course is spread out over 1-2 years and is comprised of 25 individual lessons. Each individual lessons last up one hour and are followed with a mandatory homework (for *each* lesson). After the homework is complete, the instructor will spend 30 minutes minimum reviewing and correcting the assignment followed by a one-on-one review with the teacher via a video chat session. The homework will end with a acceptable to pass/no pass grade (and the homework to be redone if necessary until the passing grade is given before moving to the next lesson).
I personally do not know of any teaching being so thorough right now, but I do not hold world knowledge. Certainly no normal college (as discussed in this thread) offers anything similar: one-on-one teacher/student meetings to this extent. Likewise, taking a class in-person does not constitute as a one-on-one lesson: 30-50 students in a class is not one-on-one. And while one can record the lesson with an iPhone for a classroom seat, it is not even close to being the same as a lesson filmed and created professionally with up close and really personal 4 different camera points of view (!!), in extremely detailed form, adding slow motion and repetition and alternate views. And yes, our students are able to review again and again any lessons, as much as they need, until they are satisfied.
What does $2800 pays for: to start part goes to the production of the video lessons themselves (needless to say), which are professionally done (same quality as the IndieGoGo film which hopefully everyone has seen). It will take years for us to recoup the cost of a single class. We do not ask our teachers to do this for free: we want some of the best teachers, and they deserve to be paid for their time and knowledge. This isn't the Red Cross. They are sharing their talent, technique and wisdom that they spent a lifetime acquiring. A sizable slice of the individual tuition goes to pay the teachers for the one-on-one time to teach (remember, 10 students means 250 hours of work per course for a teacher - a far cry for a normal college course where 30-50 students are taught at once). Add to it all the normal trappings of overhead and it should become clear that no one will make it rich here. Like, ever. If your math differs than mine then we could learn something that would be helpful to all of us.
Suzie loves calligraphy and design. She's been in the graphic design field as a business owner for nearly 30 years now: with her own graphic design firm in L.A., and running a luxury event invitation design and print shop in the San Francisco area. Her husband (me) did similar (product design company in Montreal). Hopefully there's enough knowledge and experience here to make this work to help and benefit most everyone.
Regarding the teacher credentials and students future titles: wow. What a hot button. That one seems to flare up emotions big time. There's no winning this one. Some say black, some say white. Some accuse us of being too American-centric (I guess having 3/4 of the faculty not being American is not enough), while others accuse us for using words like "faculty" itself. I'm afraid I can't address this one. We try to use the words and titles that are given to them, and I'm sorry if it offends anyone. I'll just say one thing: no one is raising an eyebrow at recognizing a student who earns a Master's degree in genetics (or art or philosophy for that matter) from any of thousands of colleges around the world.
Ink.Academy has a great many more classes are in the pipeline for the future. Including things like business management and graphic design and print layout: all applicable to many other classes we're planning to add such as sign painting, graffiti, glass/metal engraving and tattoo courses, properties of art materials, and more. Some people will have no interest in such classes. Some will. Combining some of these classes together, such as calligraphy, design and business management can make for a powerful combo for the right people. We'll keep working towards being worthy of the word Academy.
As usual, please understand that if none of these things is of interest to one person, it doesn't mean that the program is irrelevant or a bad thing for other people. Some will never warm up to the concept of online classes, no matter what. But it doesn't mean that it's a bad thing for someone else, or for everyone else!
Here's where I'm ending this: if anyone has a question about anything at all, please ask Suzie. My plea is more for those who feel a stronger emotional response (as "being concerned", or "being worried"). These emotions are real and we want to address them: there is truly something that triggered them. I'd like to invite anyone with a similar reaction to reach out to Suzie and share with her what worry there is, and see firsthand if you are right to be worried, or if it was all just a misconception. Then share it to the world.
God only know how much misinformation is flying around in the world (in general) nowadays. Lots of the most baseless content ends up being believed by enormous numbers of people--and believed blindly without "go to the source" confirmation. Let's try not to add to it, and let us all enjoy this wonderful world of calligraphy with what we all strive to create more elegantly: more beautiful communication.
cheers,
Serge (the hubby)