As promised here’s my review of Jim’s Ink Cage reservoir, which started with this
thread.
If you follow me on Instagram you might have seen my quick, hand-made, “bowl” reservoirs which are really fun to use but I haven't had time to experiment with them since so when I ran across the Ink Cage on ebay I was curious. I was on the fence about ordering until I saw Jim offering an Ink Caged Gillott 604EF and decided to jump on it (and finally get to try the 604EF
).
ORDERINGJim had my item shipped within a few hours of it being placed and it arrived at my home a few days later extremely well packaged. He also threw in an extra Eva crown nib, which was a great touch, thanks Jim!
BUILDThe nib and reservoir looked just like they did in the online pictures. Upon examining the Ink Cage, as expected, it's clear the spring is not your ordinary ballpoint pen spring--it appears to be a higher tension spring with a very specific profile that's been worked out just for this purpose and very well so. Of course you could always try and attach a cheap pen spring to one of your nibs, but just like any other product out there you're paying for the quality of all the R&D, spring, workmanship and nib. Overall I was very impressed with the build quality.
SIZE/FITTINGThe main reason I held back on buying one for as long as I did was the fact that the Ink Cage seemed to take up a lot of real estate both along the body of the nib and in clearance space underneath, which isn't such a big deal with a straight holder but can be problematic for oblique holders. I took the plunge anyway since I figured I could just use it with one of my holders adjusted for longer nibs.
LOADINGI tried dipping the nib at different depths to find the best balance of ink on the Ink Cage and figured out that about half was perfect. It was a lot of ink but not too much that I could easily have an accident, at one point I filled it to about 80% and had a large blob drop while writing. Half loaded was plenty enough though, I was able to write for quite a while (easily about 10x as compared to a single dip, if not more). The coil feeds the eyelet steadily and keeps a consistent ink flow while writing.
FLEXINGThe 604EF is known for it's great swells so I was really looking forward to seeing how it compared to my favorite nibs. Unfortunately for someone who prefers a lower nib angle, like myself, the clearance becomes an issue when flexing--this would likely not be a problem with a straight holders as the angle is inherently higher. However, this is is something that could likely be adjusted by moving the Ink Cage back a few millimeters.
CLEANINGI only attempted to use the Ink Cage with walnut and sumi ink and both washed off relatively well but I would likely not attempt to use something like gouache on it because i'm prone to leaving it on there and just making a mess.
FINAL THOUGHTSI really like the concept, craftsmanship and final product execution for the Ink Cage but there are some simply size/clearance adjustments before it's perfect for oblique holder use, at least for me. Primarily shortening the coil to about 1/2" long since I don't really need that much more ink along with moving back away from the tip a little bit. I would not hesitate to order again from Jim if I was looking to get another because he has offered to customize the Ink Cage to our specifications. Overall a great product that makes writing long pieces much easier and great service.
EDITWell, this is interesting. After a total of about 30min of actual use I managed to break my 604 EF. I'm not sure if it's just not supposed to flex this much but the first time I tried pushing it to flex as much as my Spencerian 1s my tine snapped clean off (the nib did feel weird from the start but I can't compare since I've never used another 604 EF). I think the high nib angle had something to do with it
lesson learned.