I would like to contribute on this subject. Historically, most of the European traditionalists were raised on a variety of instruments and papers. I was spoon fed with the use of the ruling pen, larger oblique nibs, and a whole host of other non conventional tools and papers. I grew up in non pen angled world which today seems to be called some kind of contemporary calligraphy. Far from the truth. The British populated forms of calligraphy were all predefined methods of understanding hands. Just turn to page 5 for Uncial. 30 degrees, 5 nib heights, constant pen angle, etc. This was so inclusive in the beginnings of the calligraphic movement that there was no room for any other systems. Basically overwhelming. Further characterized by the inclusion of never before seen materials such as quills, gold, vellum, burnishers, etc. To much for the mind to comprehend. But we ate it with a lust. As time went on there was a few peakings through the blinds of some other unusual writing being done. This influence , this contemporary non specific pen angle, this ruling pen was a dynamic force which caught many by surprise.
What a pleasure to eliminate oneself from exile from a confined system where one always had to look over their shoulder. Thats not what this art form is about. Nor is that contemporary as one may think. It was just pushed out of the way 40 years ago and now has come back as something new. Just a few thoughts . JERRY
