Also, I believe all this grip talk is best taken with a few milligrams of salt. There are always going to be some variations from person to person and that is perfectly acceptable. I am sure there were variations even among the penmen teaching the same method.
I agree.
As long as you don't grip the pen so tightly that you develop callouses, I don't see that it makes a great deal of difference how you hold your pen. I'm a great believer in the basic traditional triangular penhold, as I feel that it offers most control and flexibility, whilst being very comfortable over long periods of writing but I'm well aware that we are not machines and variations in our physical make-up can dictate certain differences. I don't believe that there s such a thing as a "wrong" penhold. In the end, the only thing that really matters, is how it looks on paper, and the means of getting there is largely irrelevant.
Nor do I believe that there is any great benefit to be gained by adopting different hand grips for different pens and styles of writing. About sixty years ago, I settled on the basic handgrip as the best for me, and I've used it without modification
for all styles of writing with all types of pen and nib, ever since.
These two photos show the identical handhold with a straight pen and with an oblique one. With the pen shaft resting just before the large knuckle, the angle of the shaft is the same in both but the flange of the oblique pen creates the correct, lower, nib-to-paper angle for use with flexible nibs.
I don't have much time for so-called "ergonomic" penholders as I feel that they vary too much to be of good general use, and would inevitably require some modification to the tried and tested traditional handgrip. Also, I have to admit that I find it very difficult to enthuse over something which has all the aesthetic appeal of a little piece of distorted driftwood.

